---
name: propose-hypotheses-b364176753cb
description: Execute complete FPF cycle from hypothesis generation to decision
argument-hint: "[problem-statement]"
allowed-tools: Task, Read, Write, Bash, AskUserQuestion
---

# Propose Hypotheses Workflow

Execute the First Principles Framework (FPF) cycle: generate competing hypotheses, verify logic, validate evidence, audit trust, and produce a decision.

## User Input

```text
Problem Statement: $ARGUMENTS
```

## Workflow Execution

### Step 1a: Create Directory Structure (Main Agent)

Create `.fpf/` directory structure if it does not exist:

```bash
mkdir -p .fpf/{evidence,decisions,sessions,knowledge/{L0,L1,L2,invalid}}
touch .fpf/{evidence,decisions,sessions,knowledge/{L0,L1,L2,invalid}}/.gitkeep
```

**Postcondition**: `.fpf/` directory scaffold exists.

---

### Step 1b: Initialize Context (FPF Agent)

Launch fpf-agent with sonnet[1m] model:
- **Description**: "Initialize FPF context"
- **Prompt**:
  ```
  Read ${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/tasks/init-context.md and execute.

  Problem Statement: $ARGUMENTS

  **Write**: Context summary to `.fpf/context.md`**
  ```

---

### Step 2: Generate Hypotheses (FPF Agent)

Launch fpf-agent with sonnet[1m] model:
- **Description**: "Generate L0 hypotheses"
- **Prompt**:
  ```
  Read ${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/tasks/generate-hypotheses.md and execute.

  Problem Statement: $ARGUMENTS
  Context: <summary from Step 1b>

  **Write**: List of hypothesis IDs and titles to `.fpf/knowledge/L0/`

  Reply with summary table in markdown format:

    | ID | Title | Kind | Scope |
    |----|-------|------|-------|
    | ... | ... | ... | ... |
  ```

---

### Step 3: Present Summary (Main Agent)

1. Read all L0 hypothesis files from `.fpf/knowledge/L0/`
2. Present summary table from agent response.
3. Ask user: "Would you like to add any hypotheses of your own? (yes/no)"

---

### Step 4: Add User Hypothesis (FPF Agent, Conditional Loop)

**Condition**: User says yes to adding hypotheses.

Launch fpf-agent with sonnet[1m] model:
- **Description**: "Add user hypothesis"
- **Prompt**:
  ```
  Read ${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/tasks/add-user-hypothesis.md and execute.

  User Hypothesis Description: <get from user>

  **Write**: User hypothesis to `.fpf/knowledge/L0/`
  ```

**Loop**: Return to Step 3 after hypothesis is added.

**Exit**: When user says no or declines to add more.

---

### Step 5: Verify Logic (Parallel Sub-Agents)

**Condition**: User finished adding hypotheses.

For EACH L0 hypothesis file in `.fpf/knowledge/L0/`, launch parallel fpf-agent with sonnet[1m] model:
- **Description**: "Verify hypothesis: <hypothesis-id>"
- **Prompt**:
  ```
  Read ${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/tasks/verify-logic.md and execute.

  Hypothesis ID: <hypothesis-id>
  Hypothesis File: .fpf/knowledge/L0/<hypothesis-id>.md

  **Move**: After you complete verification, move the file to `.fpf/knowledge/L1/` or `.fpf/knowledge/invalid/`.
  ```

**Wait for all agents**, then check that files are moved to `.fpf/knowledge/L1/` or `.fpf/knowledge/invalid/`.

---

### Step 6: Validate Evidence (Parallel Sub-Agents)

For EACH L1 hypothesis file in `.fpf/knowledge/L1/`, launch parallel fpf-agent with sonnet[1m] model:
- **Description**: "Validate hypothesis: <hypothesis-id>"
- **Prompt**:
  ```
  Read ${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/tasks/validate-evidence.md and execute.

  Hypothesis ID: <hypothesis-id>
  Hypothesis File: .fpf/knowledge/L1/<hypothesis-id>.md

  **Move**: After you complete validation, move the file to `.fpf/knowledge/L2/` or `.fpf/knowledge/invalid/`.
  ```

**Wait for all agents**, then check that files are moved to `.fpf/knowledge/L2/` or `.fpf/knowledge/invalid/`.

---

### Step 7: Audit Trust (Parallel Sub-Agents)

For EACH L2 hypothesis file in `.fpf/knowledge/L2/`, launch parallel fpf-agent with sonnet[1m] model:
- **Description**: "Audit trust: <hypothesis-id>"
- **Prompt**:
  ```
  Read ${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/tasks/audit-trust.md and execute.

  Hypothesis ID: <hypothesis-id>
  Hypothesis File: .fpf/knowledge/L2/<hypothesis-id>.md

  **Write**: Audit report to `.fpf/evidence/audit-{hypothesis-id}-{YYYY-MM-DD}.md`

  **Reply**: with R_eff score and weakest link
  ```

**Wait for all agents**, then check that audit reports are created in `.fpf/evidence/`.

---

### Step 8: Make Decision (FPF Agent)

Launch fpf-agent with sonnet[1m] model:
- **Description**: "Create decision record"
- **Prompt**:
  ```
  Read ${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/tasks/decide.md and execute.

  Problem Statement: $ARGUMENTS
  L2 Hypotheses Directory: .fpf/knowledge/L2/
  Audit Reports: .fpf/evidence/

  **Write**: Decision record to `.fpf/decisions/`

  **Reply**: with decision record summary in markdown format:

  | Hypothesis | R_eff | Weakest Link | Status |
  |------------|-------|--------------|--------|
  | ... | ... | ... | ... |

  **Recommended Decision**: <hypothesis title>

  **Rationale**: <brief explanation>
  ```

**Wait for agent**, then check that decision record is created in `.fpf/decisions/`.
---

### Step 9: Present Final Summary (Main Agent)

1. Read the DRR from `.fpf/decisions/`
2. Present results from agent response.
3. Present next steps:
   - Implement the selected hypothesis
   - Use `/fpf:status` to check FPF state
   - Use `/fpf:actualize` if codebase changes
4. Ask user if he agree with the decision, if not launch fpf-agent at step 8 with instruction to modify the decision as user wants.

---

## Completion

Workflow complete when:
- [ ] `.fpf/` directory structure exists
- [ ] Context recorded in `.fpf/context.md`
- [ ] Hypotheses generated, verified, validated, and audited
- [ ] DRR created in `.fpf/decisions/`
- [ ] Final summary presented to user

**Artifacts Created**:
- `.fpf/context.md` - Problem context
- `.fpf/knowledge/L0/*.md` - Initial hypotheses
- `.fpf/knowledge/L1/*.md` - Verified hypotheses
- `.fpf/knowledge/L2/*.md` - Validated hypotheses
- `.fpf/knowledge/invalid/*.md` - Rejected hypotheses
- `.fpf/evidence/*.md` - Evidence files
- `.fpf/decisions/*.md` - Design Rationale Record


---
Source attribution: NeoLabHQ
Original project: https://github.com/NeoLabHQ/context-engineering-kit
License: MIT
License information: https://opensource.org/license/mit
Original upstream instructions; downloaded from Mega AI Hub.

## Upstream license notice

MIT License

Copyright (c) 2026 Gabriel Moreira

Permission is hereby granted, free of charge, to any person obtaining a copy
of this software and associated documentation files (the "Software"), to deal
in the Software without restriction, including without limitation the rights
to use, copy, modify, merge, publish, distribute, sublicense, and/or sell
copies of the Software, and to permit persons to whom the Software is
furnished to do so, subject to the following conditions:

The above copyright notice and this permission notice shall be included in all
copies or substantial portions of the Software.

THE SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED "AS IS", WITHOUT WARRANTY OF ANY KIND, EXPRESS OR
IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO THE WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY,
FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE AND NONINFRINGEMENT. IN NO EVENT SHALL THE
AUTHORS OR COPYRIGHT HOLDERS BE LIABLE FOR ANY CLAIM, DAMAGES OR OTHER
LIABILITY, WHETHER IN AN ACTION OF CONTRACT, TORT OR OTHERWISE, ARISING FROM,
OUT OF OR IN CONNECTION WITH THE SOFTWARE OR THE USE OR OTHER DEALINGS IN THE
SOFTWARE.



# Mega AI Hub resource metadata

Creator / publisher: NeoLabHQ
Original project: https://github.com/NeoLabHQ/context-engineering-kit
Attribution basis: Upstream repository explicitly recorded in package mirror path

Fields of work: Data & Analytics, Product Management
Roles: Data Analyst, Market Research Analyst, Product Manager
Specialties: API
Tools: Sonnet
Country applicability: Country not specified
Classification basis: Source catalog labels
Instruction SHA-256: 5153a2587f25eef6f36fb972842ad0bf50edbf95c63917b06e7285c6d36b3c2a
