---
name: s4h-aesthetic-pattern-detection
description: "Identifies the underlying formal pattern at work — because most successful designs, arguments, and solutions share deep structural patterns, and naming the pattern unlocks the playbook. TRIGGERS: 'what pattern is this', 'pattern recognition', 'why does this work', 'identify the form', 'what structure is at play', 'what archetype is this'."
---

# Aesthetic Pattern Detection

Surface features differ — colours, words, technologies, industries. Formal patterns
recur across all of them. The same structural moves that make a symphony compelling
make a strategy compelling. The same tension-and-resolution arc that drives a thriller
drives a great pitch. Naming the pattern reveals options that surface-level analysis
cannot, because once the pattern is named, its full playbook becomes available.

---

## Your Process

**Step 1: Describe the Thing**
What does it do and how does it feel to engage with it? Focus on behaviour and
effect, not surface features — not "it uses blue and white" but "it creates calm
authority that builds confidence incrementally." Describe the experience of it.

**Framing check:** Confirm the specific artefact before continuing. State what you've identified — the actual object being analyzed and its medium or domain — in one sentence, then use `AskUserQuestion`:
- **Question:** "I'm reading this as: [your one-sentence framing of the specific artefact and its context]. Is that right?"
- **Header:** "Framing"
- **Options:**
  - **Yes — proceed** — framing is correct
  - **Adjust** — one element is off; user will correct it before you continue
  - **Reframe** — different artefact or context than read; incorporate the correction before proceeding

**Step 2: Identify Formal Patterns Present**
Work through this list systematically — multiple patterns often operate simultaneously:
- **Repetition/Rhythm** — recurring elements that create expectation, then satisfy
  or productively subvert it
- **Symmetry/Asymmetry** — balance creates stability and trust; deliberate
  asymmetry creates tension and dynamism
- **Hierarchy** — clear ordering from most to least important, large to small,
  general to specific; guides attention
- **Contrast** — sharp differences that create definition, focus attention, and
  make meaning by comparison
- **Tension/Resolution** — a problem introduced and resolved, a question posed and
  answered; the engine of narrative
- **Figure/Ground** — a subject made vivid and clear by what surrounds and recedes
- **Part/Whole** — components that build into something greater than their sum

**Step 3: Match to Domain Archetypes**
Which archetypes from design, storytelling, architecture, or music does this
resemble? The hero's journey. The fugue. The golden section. Thesis-antithesis-
synthesis. Call and response. Name the archetype and its source domain.

**Step 4: Name the Pattern**
**Before narrowing:** Show the complete set of patterns identified in Step 2 to the user first. Use `AskUserQuestion`:
- **Question:** "I've identified [N] patterns at work. Before I select the dominant one, are there any you'd flag as especially significant, or any I've missed?"
- **Header:** "Prioritise"
- **Options:**
  - **Proceed with your selection** — the set looks right
  - **Flag one** — user will name a specific pattern to treat as dominant
  - **Add a missing one** — user will describe a pattern not yet identified

Give the dominant pattern a precise name. Test: does naming it make the thing more
legible? Does it reveal why certain elements work and why others feel off? A good
pattern name is generative — it produces new options, not just descriptions.

**Step 5: Apply the Pattern**
What does the pattern imply for what should come next? What is currently in the
artefact that violates the pattern — and is that violation intentional (productive
tension) or accidental (incoherence)?

---

## Human Check-in

Before proceeding, use the `AskUserQuestion` tool. State your interpretation of the situation in 1–2 sentences — what is being analyzed and what the core question is — then ask:

- **Question:** "My read: [your 1–2 sentence interpretation]. How do you want to proceed?"
- **Header:** "Scope"
- **Options:**
  - **Full analysis** — Complete all steps, reasoning shown throughout
  - **Key findings only** — Bottom-line output, skip step-by-step detail
  - **Pattern name only** — Identify and name the underlying structure, skip full analysis
  - **Reframe** — The read is off; correct it and the analysis will follow the corrected framing

Proceed based on their selection. If the user reframes, incorporate the correction before running any analysis.

## Output Format

**Formal Patterns Present:** [list each pattern with one sentence on how it manifests]

**Archetype Match:** [closest domain archetype + which domain it comes from]

**Pattern Name:** [precise name for the dominant pattern]

**What Naming It Reveals:** [what becomes visible or legible that wasn't before]

**Pattern Implications**

| Implication | Description |
|---|---|
| What should come next | [the move the pattern calls for] |
| What is violating the pattern | [specific elements that break it] |
| Intentional or accidental | [productive subversion or incoherence] |

---

## Notes

Not every successful thing follows a single pattern cleanly — most operate with
several simultaneously. Identify the dominant pattern first; note secondary patterns
separately. The test of a good pattern name is whether it generates new options
rather than just describing what's already there.

---

## What's Next

After delivering this output, use `AskUserQuestion` to offer the next move:

- **Question:** "Patterns detected. What's next?"
- **Header:** "Next"
- **Options:**
  - `/s4h-aesthetic-coherence-check` — Check that detected patterns cohere
  - `/s4h-systems-archetype-matching` — Match aesthetic patterns to systemic archetypes
  - `/s4h-aesthetic-elegance-testing` — Test the elegance of the patterns
  - **Done** — Wrap up and synthesise what we have so far


---
Source attribution: human-avatar
Original project: https://github.com/human-avatar/skills-for-humanity/blob/a30df8b67698ccb03ef5e35d68c2eddc5321ad3f/skills/s4h-aesthetic-pattern-detection/SKILL.md
License: MIT
License information: https://opensource.org/license/mit
Original upstream instructions; downloaded from Mega AI Hub.

## Upstream license notice

MIT License

Copyright (c) 2026 Finn Fitzsimons

Permission is hereby granted, free of charge, to any person obtaining a copy
of this software and associated documentation files (the "Software"), to deal
in the Software without restriction, including without limitation the rights
to use, copy, modify, merge, publish, distribute, sublicense, and/or sell
copies of the Software, and to permit persons to whom the Software is
furnished to do so, subject to the following conditions:

The above copyright notice and this permission notice shall be included in all
copies or substantial portions of the Software.

THE SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED "AS IS", WITHOUT WARRANTY OF ANY KIND, EXPRESS OR
IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO THE WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY,
FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE AND NONINFRINGEMENT. IN NO EVENT SHALL THE
AUTHORS OR COPYRIGHT HOLDERS BE LIABLE FOR ANY CLAIM, DAMAGES OR OTHER
LIABILITY, WHETHER IN AN ACTION OF CONTRACT, TORT OR OTHERWISE, ARISING FROM,
OUT OF OR IN CONNECTION WITH THE SOFTWARE OR THE USE OR OTHER DEALINGS IN THE
SOFTWARE.



# Mega AI Hub resource metadata

Creator / publisher: human-avatar
Original project: https://github.com/human-avatar/skills-for-humanity/blob/a30df8b67698ccb03ef5e35d68c2eddc5321ad3f/skills/s4h-aesthetic-pattern-detection/SKILL.md
Attribution basis: Source repository record

Fields of work: Design, Marketing
Roles: Brand Strategist, Content Marketer, Graphic Designer, Product Designer, UX Designer
Specialties: Design
Tools: Tool not specified
Country applicability: Country not specified
Classification basis: Source catalog labels
Instruction SHA-256: 05fe46afcc7d68515f582bd7659eb9592a60c7d2552c8e3a389ea51dc4f0fac5
