AttentionInfluence: Adopting Attention Head Influence for Weak-to-Strong Pretraining Data Selection
Research paper by Kai Hua and collaborators. Published 2025-05-12. Topics: LLMs, complex reasoning ability, supervised classifiers, domain-specific biases, attention heads.
Resource information
- Authors
- Kai Hua, Steven Wu, Ge Zhang, Ke Shen
- Research area
- Language technology
- Application domain
- General AI research
- AI methods
- Large language models
- Research topics
- cs.CL
- arXiv record date
- 2025-05-12
- Publication date
- 2025-05-12
- Publication
- arXiv
- Upstream last modified
- May 13, 2025
- Last record update
- Nov 3, 2026
Abstract
Recently, there has been growing interest in collecting reasoning-intensive pretraining data to improve LLMs' complex reasoning ability. Prior approaches typically rely on supervised classifiers to identify such data, which requires labeling by humans or LLMs, often introducing domain-specific biases. Due to the attention heads being crucial to in-context reasoning, we propose AttentionInfluence, a simple yet effective, training-free method without supervision signal. Our approach enables a small pretrained language model to act as a strong data selector through a simple attention head masking operation. Specifically, we identify retrieval heads and compute the loss difference when masking these heads. We apply AttentionInfluence to a 1.3B-parameter dense model to conduct data selection on the SmolLM corpus of 241B tokens, and mix the SmolLM corpus with the selected subset comprising 73B tokens to pretrain a 7B-parameter dense model using 1T training tokens and WSD learning rate scheduling. Our experimental results demonstrate substantial improvements, ranging from 1.4pp to 3.5pp, across several knowledge-intensive and reasoning-heavy benchmarks (i.e., MMLU, MMLU-Pro, AGIEval-en, GSM8K, and HumanEval). This demonstrates an effective weak-to-strong scaling property, with small models improving the final performance of larger models-offering a promising and scalable path for reasoning-centric data selection.
