Find your landing page message
Connect a product’s value to a specific audience and write a clear first-screen message.
5,472,668 AI resources indexedWorking toward the world’s largest AI resource index.
Comprehensive content quality and maintenance assessment. Evaluates documentation quality, relevance, maintenance needs, and provides actionable recommendations.
--- type: Skill name: audit-content description: Comprehensive content quality and maintenance assessment. Evaluates documentation quality, relevance, maintenance needs, and provides actionable recommendations. required_roles: scribe: roles/scribe.editor personas: [information-architect, content-strategist, editor] generated: by: process:google-labs-jules at: 2026-01-29T21:19:07Z --- # Content Audit Skill Perform a comprehensive quality and maintenance assessment of documentation or content. This skill evaluates content against quality standards, checks for freshness, identifies maintenance needs, and provides actionable recommendations. ## Inputs - `PATH` - The directory or file path to audit (e.g., "/docs") - `SEVERITY` - (Optional) Minimum severity level to report: "low", "medium", "high" (default: "medium") - `CATEGORY` - (Optional) Categories to audit: "all", "quality", "relevance", "links", "metadata" (default: "all") - `FIX_MODE` - (Optional) Boolean, whether to suggest or apply automated fixes where possible (default: false) ## Workflow ### Step 1: Inventory & Freshness Check Scan the target `PATH` to list all content assets. - Check "Last Modified" dates. - Identify outdated content (e.g., > 6 months old). - Verify author/owner metadata. ### Step 2: Quality Assessment Evaluate content against quality metrics: - **Clarity & Readability**: Is the content easy to understand? (e.g., plain language). - **Completeness**: Does it cover the topic sufficiently? - **Accuracy**: Are there broken links, deprecated terms, or incorrect instructions? - **Structure**: Does it follow standard templates and formatting? ### Step 3: Issues & Recommendations Generate a report of identified issues, categorized by severity: - **High**: Broken paths, critical misinformation, missing required sections. - **Medium**: Outdated styling, poor readability, minor inaccuracies. - **Low**: Typos, inconsistent formatting. If `FIX_MODE` is enabled, generate or apply suggestions for fixes. ## Required Outputs A `CONTENT_AUDIT_REPORT` in markdown format containing: - **Summary**: Total files, overall quality score, critical issues count. - **Detailed Findings**: Table of issues per file with severity. - **Action Items**: Prioritized list of recommended changes. - **Freshness Report**: List of stale or outdated documents. ## Quick Reference - **Purpose**: Support content maintenance planning and quality improvement. - **Key Metrics**: Quality Score (0-100), Freshness (Age in days), Link Health (% valid).--- type: Skill name: audit-content description: Comprehensive content quality and maintenance assessment. Evaluates documentation quality, relevance, maintenance needs, and provides actionable recommendations. required_roles: scribe: roles/scribe.editor personas: [information-architect, content-strategist, editor] generated: by: process:google-labs-jules at: 2026-01-29T21:19:07Z --- # Content Audit Skill Perform a comprehensive quality and maintenance assessment of documentation or content. This skill evaluates content against quality standards, checks for freshness, identifies maintenance needs, and provides actionable recommendations. ## Inputs - `PATH` - The directory or file path to audit (e.g., "/docs") - `SEVERITY` - (Optional) Minimum severity level to report: "low", "medium", "high" (default: "medium") - `CATEGORY` - (Optional) Categories to audit: "all", "quality", "relevance", "links", "metadata" (default: "all") - `FIX_MODE` - (Optional) Boolean, whether to suggest or apply automated fixes where possible (default: false) ## Workflow ### Step 1: Inventory & Freshness Check Scan the target `PATH` to list all content assets. - Check "Last Modified" dates. - Identify outdated content (e.g., > 6 months old). - Verify author/owner metadata. ### Step 2: Quality Assessment Evaluate content against quality metrics: - **Clarity & Readability**: Is the content easy to understand? (e.g., plain language). - **Completeness**: Does it cover the topic sufficiently? - **Accuracy**: Are there broken links, deprecated terms, or incorrect instructions? - **Structure**: Does it follow standard templates and formatting? ### Step 3: Issues & Recommendations Generate a report of identified issues, categorized by severity: - **High**: Broken paths, critical misinformation, missing required sections. - **Medium**: Outdated styling, poor readability, minor inaccuracies. - **Low**: Typos, inconsistent formatting. If `FIX_MODE` is enabled, generate or apply suggestions for fixes. ## Required Outputs A `CONTENT_AUDIT_REPORT` in markdown format containing: - **Summary**: Total files, overall quality score, critical issues count. - **Detailed Findings**: Table of issues per file with severity. - **Action Items**: Prioritized list of recommended changes. - **Freshness Report**: List of stale or outdated documents. ## Quick Reference - **Purpose**: Support content maintenance planning and quality improvement. - **Key Metrics**: Quality Score (0-100), Freshness (Age in days), Link Health (% valid).
Imported from the listed AgentSkill.sh category. Complete supplied package files and notices are retained. Required external tools and credentials are not installed. No bundled code was executed during import. Individual agent task behavior has not been tested.