Experiment design partner
Translate a hypothesis into an interpretable test with metrics and guardrails.
5,439,308 AI resources indexedWorking toward the world’s largest AI resource index.
AI software team for Claude Code - 138 agents, 295 skills, 73 hooks. Self-learning, multi-agent swarm, autonomous skill evolution.
---
name: natural-transformations-39642d6371c9
description: "Problem-solving strategies for natural transformations in category theory"
allowed-tools: [Bash, Read]
---
# Natural Transformations
## When to Use
Use this skill when working on natural-transformations problems in category theory.
## Decision Tree
1. **Verify Naturality**
- eta: F => G is natural transformation between functors F, G: C -> D
- For each f: A -> B in C, diagram commutes:
G(f) . eta_A = eta_B . F(f)
- Write Lean 4: `theorem nat : η.app B ≫ G.map f = F.map f ≫ η.app A := η.naturality`
2. **Component Analysis**
- eta_A: F(A) -> G(A) for each object A
- Each component is morphism in target category D
- Lean 4: `def η : F ⟶ G where app := fun X => ...`
3. **Natural Isomorphism**
- Each component eta_A is isomorphism
- Functors F and G are naturally isomorphic
- Notation: F ≅ G (NatIso in Mathlib)
4. **Functor Category**
- [C, D] has functors as objects
- Natural transformations as morphisms
- Vertical composition: Lean 4 `CategoryTheory.NatTrans.vcomp`
- Horizontal composition: `CategoryTheory.NatTrans.hcomp`
5. **Yoneda Lemma Application**
- Nat(Hom(A, -), F) ~ F(A) naturally in A
- Lean 4: `CategoryTheory.yonedaEquiv`
- Fully embeds C into [C^op, Set]
- See: `.claude/skills/lean4-nat-trans/SKILL.md` for exact syntax
## Tool Commands
### Lean4_Naturality
```bash
# Lean 4: theorem nat : η.app B ≫ G.map f = F.map f ≫ η.app A := η.naturality
```
### Lean4_Nat_Trans
```bash
# Lean 4: def η : F ⟶ G where app := fun X => component_X
```
### Lean4_Yoneda
```bash
# Lean 4: CategoryTheory.yonedaEquiv -- Yoneda lemma
```
### Lean4_Build
```bash
lake build # Compiler-in-the-loop verification
```
## Cognitive Tools Reference
See `.claude/skills/math-mode/SKILL.md` for full tool documentation.
---
name: natural-transformations-39642d6371c9
description: "Problem-solving strategies for natural transformations in category theory"
allowed-tools: [Bash, Read]
---
# Natural Transformations
## When to Use
Use this skill when working on natural-transformations problems in category theory.
## Decision Tree
1. **Verify Naturality**
- eta: F => G is natural transformation between functors F, G: C -> D
- For each f: A -> B in C, diagram commutes:
G(f) . eta_A = eta_B . F(f)
- Write Lean 4: `theorem nat : η.app B ≫ G.map f = F.map f ≫ η.app A := η.naturality`
2. **Component Analysis**
- eta_A: F(A) -> G(A) for each object A
- Each component is morphism in target category D
- Lean 4: `def η : F ⟶ G where app := fun X => ...`
3. **Natural Isomorphism**
- Each component eta_A is isomorphism
- Functors F and G are naturally isomorphic
- Notation: F ≅ G (NatIso in Mathlib)
4. **Functor Category**
- [C, D] has functors as objects
- Natural transformations as morphisms
- Vertical composition: Lean 4 `CategoryTheory.NatTrans.vcomp`
- Horizontal composition: `CategoryTheory.NatTrans.hcomp`
5. **Yoneda Lemma Application**
- Nat(Hom(A, -), F) ~ F(A) naturally in A
- Lean 4: `CategoryTheory.yonedaEquiv`
- Fully embeds C into [C^op, Set]
- See: `.claude/skills/lean4-nat-trans/SKILL.md` for exact syntax
## Tool Commands
### Lean4_Naturality
```bash
# Lean 4: theorem nat : η.app B ≫ G.map f = F.map f ≫ η.app A := η.naturality
```
### Lean4_Nat_Trans
```bash
# Lean 4: def η : F ⟶ G where app := fun X => component_X
```
### Lean4_Yoneda
```bash
# Lean 4: CategoryTheory.yonedaEquiv -- Yoneda lemma
```
### Lean4_Build
```bash
lake build # Compiler-in-the-loop verification
```
## Cognitive Tools Reference
See `.claude/skills/math-mode/SKILL.md` for full tool documentation.
Imported from the listed AgentSkill.sh category. Complete supplied package files and notices are retained. Required external tools and credentials are not installed. No bundled code was executed during import. Individual agent task behavior has not been tested.