Create a small visual system
Define a coherent palette, type scale, spacing, and component rules for a specific product.
5,452,940 AI resources indexedWorking toward the world’s largest AI resource index.
Keep an agent disciplined while vibe coding: small shippable slices, verify before done, prefer lean skills over long prompts, and separate UI from API layers. Use this skill when scoping work, starting a vibe-coding session, or the agent is thrashing — for any stack. Not for Sarvam API signatures (use sarvam-mcp, translate, speech-to-text, text-to-speech, chat, or voice-agents).
--- name: vibe-coding description: >- Keep an agent disciplined while vibe coding: small shippable slices, verify before done, prefer lean skills over long prompts, and separate UI from API layers. Use this skill when scoping work, starting a vibe-coding session, or the agent is thrashing — for any stack. Not for Sarvam API signatures (use sarvam-mcp, translate, speech-to-text, text-to-speech, chat, or voice-agents). license: Apache-2.0 metadata: author: sarvam-ai version: "2.1" --- # Vibe coding **Vibe coding** means you steer; the agent helps you ship. You do not need to master everything upfront—you need **tight loops**, **honest checks**, and **the right small context** at the right time. This applies to any project. ## Habits 1. **Slice** the smallest shippable change. One feature, one failure mode, one screen—whatever keeps the next step obvious. 2. **Implement** with the **right reference** in view: a project skill, framework docs, or an official API page—not a wall of ad-hoc rules in the chat. 3. **Verify** before you call it done: run tests, a script, a linter, or a reproduction the user can repeat. If nothing ran, say what should run. 4. **Iterate**. Avoid giant diffs that mix auth, UI, and data in one go unless the user asked for that explicitly. ## Skills vs. long prompts - Prefer a **short domain skill** (or a link to a canonical doc) over pasting the same long instructions every session. - If the agent keeps guessing a library’s API, **read the current docs** (or a dedicated skill) instead of improvising from training data. ## Ecosystem: separate your layers - **App and UX** (framework, components, a11y, design, routing): use skills or docs for *that* layer. Browsable examples include [skills.sh](https://skills.sh) and whatever your team ships. - **Data and APIs** (databases, HTTP clients, model/speech/translation providers): use **that product’s** official reference or a provider-specific skill. Do not copy example HTTP calls from a UI skill into your real client without matching them to the real spec. - **Model, speech, translation, or vision** features: treat them like any other API—**vendor docs and provider skills** win over generic chat guesses. ## Gotchas | Issue | What to do | |-------|------------| | Stale or invented APIs | Open the **current** project docs or provider documentation; do not trust memory alone. | | One skill’s example bleeding into the wrong layer | A React skill’s `fetch` snippet is not automatically your model API—reconcile with the right spec. | | Pasting a novel into every request | Shrink to a skill, a doc link, or a few bullets; refresh when the library changes. | | “Big bang” refactors | Split, verify, repeat. |--- name: vibe-coding description: >- Keep an agent disciplined while vibe coding: small shippable slices, verify before done, prefer lean skills over long prompts, and separate UI from API layers. Use this skill when scoping work, starting a vibe-coding session, or the agent is thrashing — for any stack. Not for Sarvam API signatures (use sarvam-mcp, translate, speech-to-text, text-to-speech, chat, or voice-agents). license: Apache-2.0 metadata: author: sarvam-ai version: "2.1" --- # Vibe coding **Vibe coding** means you steer; the agent helps you ship. You do not need to master everything upfront—you need **tight loops**, **honest checks**, and **the right small context** at the right time. This applies to any project. ## Habits 1. **Slice** the smallest shippable change. One feature, one failure mode, one screen—whatever keeps the next step obvious. 2. **Implement** with the **right reference** in view: a project skill, framework docs, or an official API page—not a wall of ad-hoc rules in the chat. 3. **Verify** before you call it done: run tests, a script, a linter, or a reproduction the user can repeat. If nothing ran, say what should run. 4. **Iterate**. Avoid giant diffs that mix auth, UI, and data in one go unless the user asked for that explicitly. ## Skills vs. long prompts - Prefer a **short domain skill** (or a link to a canonical doc) over pasting the same long instructions every session. - If the agent keeps guessing a library’s API, **read the current docs** (or a dedicated skill) instead of improvising from training data. ## Ecosystem: separate your layers - **App and UX** (framework, components, a11y, design, routing): use skills or docs for *that* layer. Browsable examples include [skills.sh](https://skills.sh) and whatever your team ships. - **Data and APIs** (databases, HTTP clients, model/speech/translation providers): use **that product’s** official reference or a provider-specific skill. Do not copy example HTTP calls from a UI skill into your real client without matching them to the real spec. - **Model, speech, translation, or vision** features: treat them like any other API—**vendor docs and provider skills** win over generic chat guesses. ## Gotchas | Issue | What to do | |-------|------------| | Stale or invented APIs | Open the **current** project docs or provider documentation; do not trust memory alone. | | One skill’s example bleeding into the wrong layer | A React skill’s `fetch` snippet is not automatically your model API—reconcile with the right spec. | | Pasting a novel into every request | Shrink to a skill, a doc link, or a few bullets; refresh when the library changes. | | “Big bang” refactors | Split, verify, repeat. |
Includes the original skill and its supporting files. Review scripts and install any external dependencies before use.