Specify a webhook-driven task for OpenClaw
Describe event inputs, validation, deduplication, and intended actions before integration work.
5,505,781 AI resources indexedWorking toward the world’s largest AI resource index.
Use when authoring an integration test plan before implementation — when about to design tests for a multi-component feature, when probing for already-broken behavior, when a domain has a +bugfix history worth learning from
--- name: sp-write-test-plan-53a6db8d586c description: Use when the user asks for an integration test plan for a multi-component, failure-prone, or historically fragile system. --- # Integration Test Planning Write a reasoning-driven test plan in FlickNote. Cover expected behavior and adversarial failure modes. ## Explore Reality - Read the current implementation and existing tests. - Search prior designs, research, and bug reports with `flicknote find <keywords>`. - Map entry points, state transitions, external systems, concurrency, retries, and partial failures. - Confirm the target repository and exact test surface. Discuss the proposed test boundary with the user before writing the plan if it is not already agreed. ## Constructive Coverage Define: - Major happy-path lifecycles - Boundary and empty inputs - Defaults and missing configuration - State invariants and security preconditions - Idempotency and resource lifecycle rules ## Adversarial Coverage Run three passes: 1. Prior failures: turn each relevant historical bug class into a regression test. 2. Seam walk: concurrency, retries, partial failures, idempotency, timeouts, corruption, edge dates/numbers, hostile inputs. 3. Red team: write concrete failure hypotheses and the test that would falsify each one. Distinguish: - Planned: test is needed; no proof of failure - Confirmed broken: code or evidence proves current behavior is wrong - Dismissed: investigated and ruled out with a reason ## Persist to FlickNote Save the plan in `orientation`: flicknote add --project orientation Structure: # Test Plan: <component> ## Scope and anti-goals ## Current implementation ## Constructive cases ## Prior-failure regressions ## Seam walk ## Red-team hypotheses ## Test environment and fixtures ## Execution order ## Exit criteria ## Risks and unreachable coverage Each test case must identify the setup, action, expected result, proof source, and cleanup. Record confirmed bugs in the same note; do not create tasks automatically. ## Validate Re-read the note as the test implementer: - Are fixtures and environments obtainable? - Can each result be attributed to the layer under test? - Are negative controls actually achievable? - Are paths, commands, evidence, and cleanup exact? - Is unreachable third-party coverage stated plainly? Update the FlickNote note, then return its ID and a concise summary. Stop; do not execute the plan or invoke another skill.--- name: sp-write-test-plan-53a6db8d586c description: Use when the user asks for an integration test plan for a multi-component, failure-prone, or historically fragile system. --- # Integration Test Planning Write a reasoning-driven test plan in FlickNote. Cover expected behavior and adversarial failure modes. ## Explore Reality - Read the current implementation and existing tests. - Search prior designs, research, and bug reports with `flicknote find <keywords>`. - Map entry points, state transitions, external systems, concurrency, retries, and partial failures. - Confirm the target repository and exact test surface. Discuss the proposed test boundary with the user before writing the plan if it is not already agreed. ## Constructive Coverage Define: - Major happy-path lifecycles - Boundary and empty inputs - Defaults and missing configuration - State invariants and security preconditions - Idempotency and resource lifecycle rules ## Adversarial Coverage Run three passes: 1. Prior failures: turn each relevant historical bug class into a regression test. 2. Seam walk: concurrency, retries, partial failures, idempotency, timeouts, corruption, edge dates/numbers, hostile inputs. 3. Red team: write concrete failure hypotheses and the test that would falsify each one. Distinguish: - Planned: test is needed; no proof of failure - Confirmed broken: code or evidence proves current behavior is wrong - Dismissed: investigated and ruled out with a reason ## Persist to FlickNote Save the plan in `orientation`: flicknote add --project orientation Structure: # Test Plan: <component> ## Scope and anti-goals ## Current implementation ## Constructive cases ## Prior-failure regressions ## Seam walk ## Red-team hypotheses ## Test environment and fixtures ## Execution order ## Exit criteria ## Risks and unreachable coverage Each test case must identify the setup, action, expected result, proof source, and cleanup. Record confirmed bugs in the same note; do not create tasks automatically. ## Validate Re-read the note as the test implementer: - Are fixtures and environments obtainable? - Can each result be attributed to the layer under test? - Are negative controls actually achievable? - Are paths, commands, evidence, and cleanup exact? - Is unreachable third-party coverage stated plainly? Update the FlickNote note, then return its ID and a concise summary. Stop; do not execute the plan or invoke another skill.
Imported from the listed AgentSkill.sh category. Complete supplied package files and notices are retained. Required external tools and credentials are not installed. No bundled code was executed during import. Individual agent task behavior has not been tested.