Review requirements for implementation gaps
Find missing states, unclear acceptance criteria, and contradictory requirements in a supplied brief.
5,417,266 AI resources indexedWorking toward the world’s largest AI resource index.
Maps acceptance criteria to implementation evidence, tests, and scope creep. Use during review when a diff, PR, ticket, or story includes numbered ACs.
---
name: specialist-ac-verifier-fa4ff0062db8
description: Maps acceptance criteria to implementation evidence, tests, and scope creep. Use during review when a diff, PR, ticket, or story includes numbered ACs.
metadata:
internal: true
triggers:
keywords:
- AC verification
- acceptance criteria
- scope creep
- requirement coverage
---
# Specialist: AC Verifier
## **Priority: P1 (HIGH)**
## Role
Verify each acceptance criterion against diff evidence, existing implementation, tests, and non-goals.
## Budget
- First pass: diff or supplied evidence only.
- File cap: <= 1 file per unclear AC, <= 5 files total.
- Use Jira/GitHub/GitLab/ADO/Zephyr/code graph MCPs only when configured.
- No sub-agents.
- If no AC list and no diff/evidence exist, return `BLOCKED` instead of guessing scope.
## Steps
1. Number ACs exactly as provided.
2. Classify each AC: Fully Met, Partially Met, Not Met, or Pre-existing.
3. Cite evidence: changed file, existing file, test, Zephyr TC, or walkthrough proof.
4. Flag scope creep: changed behavior not mapped to any AC.
5. If MCP unavailable, ask for exported ticket/PR text or use local artifacts.
## Output
```text
### AC Verification
| # | Acceptance Criteria | Status | Evidence |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| [AC] | [text] | [status] | [evidence] |
#### Scope Creep
- [item or None]
#### Missing ACs
- [item or None]
```
## Anti-Patterns
- No architecture/security/test commentary unless it directly affects AC status.
- No ticket-scope violation unless scope tags/non-goals were checked.
---
name: specialist-ac-verifier-fa4ff0062db8
description: Maps acceptance criteria to implementation evidence, tests, and scope creep. Use during review when a diff, PR, ticket, or story includes numbered ACs.
metadata:
internal: true
triggers:
keywords:
- AC verification
- acceptance criteria
- scope creep
- requirement coverage
---
# Specialist: AC Verifier
## **Priority: P1 (HIGH)**
## Role
Verify each acceptance criterion against diff evidence, existing implementation, tests, and non-goals.
## Budget
- First pass: diff or supplied evidence only.
- File cap: <= 1 file per unclear AC, <= 5 files total.
- Use Jira/GitHub/GitLab/ADO/Zephyr/code graph MCPs only when configured.
- No sub-agents.
- If no AC list and no diff/evidence exist, return `BLOCKED` instead of guessing scope.
## Steps
1. Number ACs exactly as provided.
2. Classify each AC: Fully Met, Partially Met, Not Met, or Pre-existing.
3. Cite evidence: changed file, existing file, test, Zephyr TC, or walkthrough proof.
4. Flag scope creep: changed behavior not mapped to any AC.
5. If MCP unavailable, ask for exported ticket/PR text or use local artifacts.
## Output
```text
### AC Verification
| # | Acceptance Criteria | Status | Evidence |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| [AC] | [text] | [status] | [evidence] |
#### Scope Creep
- [item or None]
#### Missing ACs
- [item or None]
```
## Anti-Patterns
- No architecture/security/test commentary unless it directly affects AC status.
- No ticket-scope violation unless scope tags/non-goals were checked.
Imported from the listed AgentSkill.sh category. Complete supplied package files and notices are retained. Required external tools and credentials are not installed. No bundled code was executed during import. Individual agent task behavior has not been tested.