Check a page for accessibility
Review supplied markup or descriptions for practical accessibility issues and fixes.
5,186,310 AI resources indexedWorking toward the world’s largest AI resource index.
Visual QA verdict for screenshots and UI. Use for "verify UI", "visual check", "screenshot verdict", and "visual comparison".
---
name: visual-verdict-6a226264bfa0
description: Visual QA verdict for screenshots and UI. Use for "verify UI", "visual check", "screenshot verdict", and "visual comparison".
trigger: /oma:visual-verdict
---
## Skill: visual-verdict
Evaluate screenshots and visual outputs for quality and correctness.
## When to Use
- UI verification after changes
- Screenshot comparison
- Visual regression testing
- Design implementation review
- Before/after comparisons
## Verdict Process
### 1. Load Reference
- Get expected design/screenshot
- Understand intended appearance
- Note key elements
### 2. Load Actual
- Get actual screenshot
- Ensure same viewport/context
- Note environment differences
### 3. Element Comparison
#### Layout
- [ ] Elements in expected positions
- [ ] Correct spacing
- [ ] Proper alignment
- [ ] No overflow/clipping
#### Styling
- [ ] Correct colors
- [ ] Appropriate fonts
- [ ] Expected sizes
- [ ] Shadows/elevation
#### Content
- [ ] Text matches
- [ ] No truncation
- [ ] Images load
- [ ] Icons correct
#### Functionality
- [ ] Interactive elements visible
- [ ] Hover states shown
- [ ] Animations captured
- [ ] Responsive layout
### 4. Issue Classification
| Severity | Description | Action |
|----------|-------------|--------|
| Critical | Wrong/missing content | Must fix |
| Major | Significant layout/style issues | Should fix |
| Minor | Small deviations | Consider fixing |
| Trivial | Imperceptible differences | Ignore |
### 5. Verdict
**PASS** — Matches expected, no issues
**CONDITIONAL** — Minor issues, acceptable
**FAIL** — Major issues need fixing
**INCONCLUSIVE** — Cannot determine
## Output Format
```
## Visual Verdict
### Comparison
**Reference:** {file/URL}
**Actual:** {file/URL}
### Element Checks
#### Layout
| Element | Expected | Actual | Status |
|---------|----------|--------|--------|
| {elem} | {pos} | {pos} | ✅/❌ |
#### Styling
| Element | Expected | Actual | Status |
|---------|----------|--------|--------|
| {elem} | {style} | {style} | ✅/❌ |
#### Content
| Element | Expected | Actual | Status |
|---------|----------|--------|--------|
| {elem} | {text} | {text} | ✅/❌ |
### Issues Found
#### Critical
- **{issue}** — {description}
#### Major
- **{issue}** — {description}
#### Minor
- **{issue}** — {description}
### Verdict
| Criterion | Status |
|-----------|--------|
| Layout | ✅/❌ |
| Styling | ✅/❌ |
| Content | ✅/❌ |
| Functionality | ✅/❌ |
**Overall:** PASS / CONDITIONAL / FAIL / INCONCLUSIVE
**Reason:** {explanation}
**Recommendation:** {if any}
```
## Constraints
- Compare equivalent views
- Note environmental differences
- Be consistent in evaluation
- Document all issues
- Provide specific feedback
---
name: visual-verdict-6a226264bfa0
description: Visual QA verdict for screenshots and UI. Use for "verify UI", "visual check", "screenshot verdict", and "visual comparison".
trigger: /oma:visual-verdict
---
## Skill: visual-verdict
Evaluate screenshots and visual outputs for quality and correctness.
## When to Use
- UI verification after changes
- Screenshot comparison
- Visual regression testing
- Design implementation review
- Before/after comparisons
## Verdict Process
### 1. Load Reference
- Get expected design/screenshot
- Understand intended appearance
- Note key elements
### 2. Load Actual
- Get actual screenshot
- Ensure same viewport/context
- Note environment differences
### 3. Element Comparison
#### Layout
- [ ] Elements in expected positions
- [ ] Correct spacing
- [ ] Proper alignment
- [ ] No overflow/clipping
#### Styling
- [ ] Correct colors
- [ ] Appropriate fonts
- [ ] Expected sizes
- [ ] Shadows/elevation
#### Content
- [ ] Text matches
- [ ] No truncation
- [ ] Images load
- [ ] Icons correct
#### Functionality
- [ ] Interactive elements visible
- [ ] Hover states shown
- [ ] Animations captured
- [ ] Responsive layout
### 4. Issue Classification
| Severity | Description | Action |
|----------|-------------|--------|
| Critical | Wrong/missing content | Must fix |
| Major | Significant layout/style issues | Should fix |
| Minor | Small deviations | Consider fixing |
| Trivial | Imperceptible differences | Ignore |
### 5. Verdict
**PASS** — Matches expected, no issues
**CONDITIONAL** — Minor issues, acceptable
**FAIL** — Major issues need fixing
**INCONCLUSIVE** — Cannot determine
## Output Format
```
## Visual Verdict
### Comparison
**Reference:** {file/URL}
**Actual:** {file/URL}
### Element Checks
#### Layout
| Element | Expected | Actual | Status |
|---------|----------|--------|--------|
| {elem} | {pos} | {pos} | ✅/❌ |
#### Styling
| Element | Expected | Actual | Status |
|---------|----------|--------|--------|
| {elem} | {style} | {style} | ✅/❌ |
#### Content
| Element | Expected | Actual | Status |
|---------|----------|--------|--------|
| {elem} | {text} | {text} | ✅/❌ |
### Issues Found
#### Critical
- **{issue}** — {description}
#### Major
- **{issue}** — {description}
#### Minor
- **{issue}** — {description}
### Verdict
| Criterion | Status |
|-----------|--------|
| Layout | ✅/❌ |
| Styling | ✅/❌ |
| Content | ✅/❌ |
| Functionality | ✅/❌ |
**Overall:** PASS / CONDITIONAL / FAIL / INCONCLUSIVE
**Reason:** {explanation}
**Recommendation:** {if any}
```
## Constraints
- Compare equivalent views
- Note environmental differences
- Be consistent in evaluation
- Document all issues
- Provide specific feedback
Imported from the listed AgentSkill.sh category. Complete supplied package files and notices are retained. Required external tools and credentials are not installed. No bundled code was executed during import. Individual agent task behavior has not been tested.